Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Aon»

Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
561 bytes añadidos ,  hace 10 años
m
:With that out of the way, on the matter of this specific circumstance, I would say that each individual Aon is not noteworthy of an article in of themselves. You cannot possibly equate the two sentences of an Aon to the wealth of information we have on every metal. You wouldn't make an article on each Command, would you? You would, however, probably write articles for each metal, and possibly when we more of Stormlight, for each Surge or each Order of Radiant.
:Anyway, can you tell I've had to listen lawyers all freaking week? XD The question of indices is an important one, and hey, I'll be the first to admit that we wanted character and place articles to boost the article count. But I kind of like having, say, the Rosharan category, and the Roshar category to be a complete description of characters and places there. We should probably have this conversation, because we kind of haphazardly did things in the wiki's early years. But, I largely feel we should defer this matter until we see Words of Radiance. A new book of that scale will test if our structure of the wiki has the proper expandability and adaptability we will require six books down the line. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 06:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
:: I agree with your point re: ashmounds, and I kinda do like some index articles (for example, [[Shai]]'s modes, the people of [[Armedius Academy]], maybe even [[Stephen Leeds]]' aspects, and the [[Rithmatics]] lines and things. But also, there are a few of the Aon's that have a few paragraphs of content; it might be worth making at least a few Aon X articles? Considering that some of these 'indexes' have chunks of content, it might be viable/policy to indexify the spren stuff? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 06:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Shards, Editors, Keepers, Synod
40 275

ediciones

Menú de navegación