Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Susebron»
Ir a la navegación
Ir a la búsqueda
m (reply) |
(reply) |
||
| Línea 2: | Línea 2: | ||
I suggest we create a new page for [[God Kings]] separate from that of [[Susebron]], since they will, hopefully, be discussed in further detail in future books by Brandon. That are multiple references that apply to God Kings as a whole, and not (just) to Susebron, such as [[Vasher]] being essentially the first God King (known as Peacegiver at the time). One such reference is [http://www.theoryland.com/intvmain.php?i=428#38 this]. -- Anon |
I suggest we create a new page for [[God Kings]] separate from that of [[Susebron]], since they will, hopefully, be discussed in further detail in future books by Brandon. That are multiple references that apply to God Kings as a whole, and not (just) to Susebron, such as [[Vasher]] being essentially the first God King (known as Peacegiver at the time). One such reference is [http://www.theoryland.com/intvmain.php?i=428#38 this]. -- Anon |
||
: Good point, should we? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 12:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC) |
: Good point, should we? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 12:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::I'm not sure how useful it would be ''currently''. Upon the next book releasing I would agree (assuming more information is actually given to us). --[[User:Blaze1616|Blaze1616]] ([[User talk:Blaze1616|talk]]) 13:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revisión del 13:15 2 abr 2015
New Page?
I suggest we create a new page for God Kings separate from that of Susebron, since they will, hopefully, be discussed in further detail in future books by Brandon. That are multiple references that apply to God Kings as a whole, and not (just) to Susebron, such as Vasher being essentially the first God King (known as Peacegiver at the time). One such reference is this. -- Anon