Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Alomancia»
| Línea 7: | Línea 7: | ||
:Never really thought about that... So you want history and such? The way you've described it sounds awesome to me. It's role in the culture of assassination in the Final Empire and such --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) |
:Never really thought about that... So you want history and such? The way you've described it sounds awesome to me. It's role in the culture of assassination in the Final Empire and such --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) |
||
| + | |||
| + | I'd love to do a big edit to it, not sure where to start though guess I'll do another readthrough and trawl of the interview DB --[[User:Voidus|Voidus]] ([[User talk:Voidus|talk]]) 05:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revisión del 05:40 27 feb 2013
Okay, so this article is terrible
Really, it is. Snap redirects here, and it isn't even talked about. This article requires a heck of a lot more than a simple run down of each metal.
I mean, we should be interested in the Shardic stuff behind Allomancy (like the Spiritweb stuff!). We should be discussing lore about Snapping, of which there is a lot. Greater care should be taken describing how knowledge of Allomancy evolved from ten metals to more, and the misconception about atium...
The article is long, but still really incomplete for such a well-defined magic system. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- Never really thought about that... So you want history and such? The way you've described it sounds awesome to me. It's role in the culture of assassination in the Final Empire and such --Windrunner (talk)
I'd love to do a big edit to it, not sure where to start though guess I'll do another readthrough and trawl of the interview DB --Voidus (talk) 05:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)