4172
ediciones
Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Aon»
sin resumen de edición
|
:Anyway, can you tell I've had to listen lawyers all freaking week? XD The question of indices is an important one, and hey, I'll be the first to admit that we wanted character and place articles to boost the article count. But I kind of like having, say, the Rosharan category, and the Roshar category to be a complete description of characters and places there. We should probably have this conversation, because we kind of haphazardly did things in the wiki's early years. But, I largely feel we should defer this matter until we see Words of Radiance. A new book of that scale will test if our structure of the wiki has the proper expandability and adaptability we will require six books down the line. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 06:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
:: I agree with your point re: ashmounds, and I kinda do like some index articles (for example, [[Shai]]'s modes, the people of [[Armedius Academy]], maybe even [[Stephen Leeds]]' aspects, and the [[Rithmatics]] lines and things. But also, there are a few of the Aon's that have a few paragraphs of content; it might be worth making at least a few Aon X articles? Considering that some of these 'indexes' have chunks of content, it might be viable/policy to indexify the spren stuff? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 06:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
::Wow, Chaos... That's quite a block of text. Reading it though, I can't say I find anything there I disagree with. I am vehemently opposed to making a spren index though. I like the little articles, and we're only going to get more details as the series goes on, such as what fabrials they're used in, properties of the spren, what form they bond with Parshendi to make, etc. In reality, the only three Aons worthy of their own page are the ones Brandon expanded on for the Badali jewelry page. I could see making a separate article for them, but they still need a place on the main index, with one of those little italicized, "main article" links, in my opinion. --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 06:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
| |||