755
ediciones
Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Shallan Davar»
Ir a la navegación
Ir a la búsqueda
m
→Shallan bisexual?
|
: I completely agree. It's absolutely not such a defining characteristic that it should be mentioned in the introduction, and the tweet doesn't confirm that she is bisexual. He doesn't say "yes, she is"; he says "I agree that she comes across that way". I think something along the lines of "Shallan may be bisexual," should be written into the Personality/Appearance section. -[[User:Jofwu|Jofwu]] ([[User talk:Jofwu|talk]]) 10:48, 6 December 2016 (MST)
:: I just removed it. Someone can add it back into personality as a "speculated that she is bisexual", but I don't think it is appropriate. Seems more like fan projection than legitimate speculation. [[User:SAMWAF|SAMWAF]] ([[User talk:SAMWAF|talk]]) 13:42, 7 December 2016 (MST)
::: I added it in the first place because when presented with the idea, he specifically said, as I quoted in the reference, "This wasn't directly on my mind while writing, but looking back, I think it was in my subconscious." He wrote her like that subconsciously, not that he did not write it that way. Saying that he subconsciously made it so means that it ''is'' so. He said nothing so ambiguous as "I agree it comes across that way." Moreover, in a followup tweet he didn't correct a person who mentioned it, when it would have been the perfect opportunity to clear up any miscommunication. Given these two things together (plus textual evidence from the books which prompted the question in the first place) it really can't be considered to merely be fan speculation, or somehow illegitmate speculation. I added it where I did more for the sake convenience -- choosing to dump information into the article to be moved around and edited later as necessary. Now, given all that, I'll add it to the article again, this time in the personality section, and cite the second tweet. --[[User:Shroom|Shroom]] ([[User talk:Shroom|talk]]) 23:12, 31 December 2016 (MST)
| |||