Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Vínculo Nahel»

Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
:My reasoning is Nahel bond is an intrinsic part of Surgebinding and should definitely be discussed on that page. Also as far as I'm aware of, only the bond between spren and the Surgebinder is called the Nahel bond, so its existence is entirely dependent on Surgebinding, if that makes sense. I doubt if I managed to put everything we know on the Surgebinding article, but I think I at least covered a significant amount of it. If there's missing stuff, it can and should be added to Surgebinding, because it directly involves Surgebinding itself. So I don't think there's any point to having the same content in two different places.--[[User:Cem|Cem]] ([[User talk:Cem|talk]]) 00:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
:: It depends on how big the section ends up being imo. I see your point cem but I would hold that it would be better as it's own page --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 08:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 
== Nightblood a spren? ==
 
Someone has listed Nightblood as a spren for Szeth with no citation. Seems like speculation, and though an interesting one, it seems misleading if there isn't source confirmation.
2

ediciones

Menú de navegación