Diferencia entre revisiones de «Usuario discusión:Fbstj»
Ir a la navegación
Ir a la búsqueda
m (Reverted edits by Fbstj (talk) to last revision by Bryce Carmony) |
m (Reverted edits by Fbstj (talk) to last revision by DemonDays64) Etiqueta: Reversión |
||
| (No se muestran 38 ediciones intermedias de 17 usuarios) | |||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| + | To contact me please come by the [https://discord.gg/KEv3fhN chatroom], and @mention me in one of the channels. Thanks |
||
| − | == Azir == |
||
| + | == Why did you revert my edit? == |
||
| − | I was wondering what your reason was for reverting the changes I made to the Azir page? [[User:Arook|Arook]] ([[User talk:Arook|talk]]) 09:13, 31 May 2015 (MDT) |
||
| + | I'm confused about why you reverted my most recent edit on [[Ars Arcanum]]. If italicizing book titles in headers is the convention, that's fine, but why de-italicize ''[[Elantris]]'' in the body? [[User:Disorientedperson|Disorientedperson]] ([[User talk:Disorientedperson|talk]]) 09:18, 2 June 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | : Hey there Arook. I reverted your changes because you removed some info from the page, and while you removed redundancy we encourage you to not remove any facts if possible. Thanks for your contributions and I encourage you to continue to edit things :D --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 09:58, 31 May 2015 (MDT) |
||
| + | : Oh, sorry I didn't see the Elantris link when I clicked the 'revert' button, that's a fine change and feel free to make it again. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 14:57, 2 June 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | == Adoline == |
||
| + | == Cosmere Easter Eggs == |
||
| − | Pretty sure Adoline is just one aspect. She has OCD, others have different issues. Hence my singularization. Ja? [[User:Gargoyle]] ([[User talk:Gargoyle|talk]]) |
||
| + | I was curious what the policy is for pointing out cosmere connections/easter eggs. One of my additions to the article for Tetradel was recently reverted, and I'm wondering if the change itself was unwelcome, or if I'd simply put it in the wrong place. Any clarity you can offer would be helpful. Thank you! [[User:Purp|Purp]] ([[User talk:Purp|talk]]) 07:24, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | :It's singular they, we're never given a gender for them. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:12, 16 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | ::Would it be acceptable to replace "they" with "Adoline"? As is, it sounds really odd. --[[User:Gargoyle]] ([[User talk:Gargoyle|talk]]) |
||
| + | : Hey there Purp. Your edits are certainly not unwelcome! In that case though, you added pure speculation and didn't link to any sort of significant discussion or agreement of the ideas, so me and Windrunner (one of the other staff) decided to remove it. Thank you again for all your other edits --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 07:31, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | == Bands of Mourning == |
||
| + | :: I see. Since the lines in the two books describing the men were virtually identical, I thought that was sufficient to post the possible connection. If all connections/easter eggs require some sort of confirmation outside of the text itself, I will adjust any future contributions accordingly. Thank you for the quick response. [[User:Purp|Purp]] ([[User talk:Purp|talk]]) 07:50, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | I know the book was released only just in the past week, but how would one go about making the link to Bands of Mourning in the infobox unitalicised - I feel the compulsive need to correct that. Asking you because you seem to be someone who would know that kind of thing. [[User:Chaoswilldevour]] ([[User talk:Chaoswilldevour|talk]]) |
||
| − | : |
+ | : Thanks for understanding. It's a good idea, but the wiki isn't really meant for every single speculation, especially since so much of speculation is in the eye of the speculator. We'd much rather keep it as things that are definitely in the books or from the words of Brandon or his team. I say you should share and discuss your theory somewhere else and then maybe someone will ask Brandon about it! --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 08:03, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
| + | == Oathbringer Summaries Template == |
||
| − | :: The "Mistborn (Scadrial)" one and the "Mistborn Era 2" are two I can name off the top of my head that haven't changed yet, though this might be a cache error like you said - I'll edit this if I find any more. [[User:Chaoswilldevour]] ([[User talk:Chaoswilldevour|talk]]) |
||
| + | Why did you revert my edits to [[Template:Oathbringer Summaries]]? My goal was to add more chapter titles and make the chapter titles in Part 1 easier to read. --[[User:LevenThumps|LevenThumps]] ([[User talk:LevenThumps|talk]]) 11:47, 19 November 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | == Category Splinter == |
||
| + | : Hey there, sorry for that, I did it because it made it ''harder'' to read on some screen resolutions. once the template is finished we will probably fix it so it looks ok wherever it's read. I'm sorry I undid some of the non line-break things too, feel free to re-add them if you want [[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 12:33, 19 November 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | Ok, so where is it if one already exists? |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | :[[:category: splinters]] --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 23:25, 17 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | + | I saw that [[Cite:Arcanum-1415]] doesn’t exist and wanted to make it so that references are better-looking, but I don’t have permission to create pages. How can I gain permission to make pages? [[User:DemonDays64|DemonDays64]] ([[User talk:DemonDays64|talk]]) 19:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC) |
|
| − | |||
| − | : We prefer plural names though, as with the majority of other entity-including categories --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 23:51, 17 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Regarding Places Category == |
||
| − | |||
| − | Hello. |
||
| − | |||
| − | I realized soon after I made the change on the Alendel page that it hadn't worked out as I'd hoped, but I'm not exactly sure why. The Category:Places Category was removed by Chaos, to be replaced with Category:Locations, and I was trying to get rid of a redlink category. However, when I swapped around the word 'Place' with 'Location', it didn't work. Is there any way you would suggest that we can get rid of the redlink category? |
||
| − | |||
| − | : Hey, it's great to see you editing. That's because you didn't change a category (<nowiki>[[Category: places]]</nowiki>) you changed the template ({{t|place}}), which automatically adds [[:Category: Locations]]. What you were seeing when you saw it was still in :Category: Places was a cached version of the page --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Spren and Character Templates == |
||
| − | |||
| − | I had a question on templates Specifically Spren info and Character templates. lets start with Spren info is there a way to make it so that it can identify Spren that have gain sentience(i.e. syl) as opposed to Spren like Flame spren and Rain spren. the reason for this is that these Spren are Splinters so I want them in the Splinter category and I was hoping that the info box would be the best way to do that and it leaves the pages less cluttered. |
||
| − | |||
| − | So the Character template may just be a confusion on my part but each person in the Cosmere would have this set of identifiers race(i.e. human, listerner etc), homeworld, local world ethnicity, current local political affiliation or nationality. It seems to me that Character template is not Set up to divide these and place them in the appropriate sub categories. Am I just not understanding how it works? an example is if I put a persons home world as Roshar it should Identity them as Rosharan on the page and add them to this subcategory. As it sits I kind of does some of it it adds Roshar and maybe stating Rosharan is redundant but it should make them a part of that sub category either way right. I do not know enough about templates to edit one like this yet so until I know what I'm doing I'm not going to. However if you are able to change the template I can track down the pages to update them though most would be fixed immediately for the home world. I hope that made sense. [[User:Arook|Arook]] ([[User talk:Arook|talk]]) 18:22, 18 June 2015 (MDT) arook |
||
| − | |||
| − | :The spren info box is going to be depreciated and these two types will go in either Lifeforms or Characters, respectively. I'm not sure what you are referring to with the second point, because it does add these templates directly, doesn't it? Everything that is a character has a world parameter and Rosharan is always added there automatically. Do you see an example where it does not? -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 19:22, 18 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | :Cool then spren info is obsolete. As for the character template I can not remember/find what page I was using to edit the other day but i double checked and it does add the Rosharan category. I think maybe that page was telling me that that it does not have an ethnicity or nationality tag. Ya Looking at that template didn't help me understand it every much I'm sure now it was just me not understanding what you guys already did. [[User:Arook|Arook]] ([[User talk:Arook|talk]]) 12:06, 19 June 2015 (MDT) arook |
||
| − | |||
| − | ok I found that page again and it was the ethnicity or nationality tag it was taking about so that my me not understanding. If you give a character an world tag of Shadesmar what categories would that put it in? Would ethnicity (i.e. Cryptic)be the best place for the Splinter category to be attached to? Would Nationality (i.e. Spren)be the best place for the Spren category to be attached to? [[User:Arook|Arook]] ([[User talk:Arook|talk]]) 14:16, 20 June 2015 (MDT) arook |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Aspects == |
||
| − | |||
| − | There are quite a few links to it from the Legion pages, which I'm planning to lengthen next- phattemer |
||
| − | : There's already an equivalent page at [[Aspect]]. You can pluralise that link by typing <nowiki>[[Aspect]]s</nowiki> --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 09:19, 24 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Claim Edit == |
||
| − | |||
| − | Is there a way I can claim an edit? I was editing [[returned]], but somehow was logged out during the edit and it was attributed to my IP instead of to me. [http://www.coppermind.net/wiki/Returned?oldid=51377 This is the edit] [[User:ZAD-Man|ZAD-Man]] ([[User talk:ZAD-Man|talk]]) 10:49, 29 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | |||
| − | : Ahhh hmmm, I don't think there is any easy way, unfortunately. I could go ahead and revert those changes so you can 'reapply' them with your account if you really must? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 10:58, 29 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :: Eh, that's fine. :) What matters is that the changes made it in there, so if there isn't a easy way, it's no problem. [[User:ZAD-Man|ZAD-Man]] ([[User talk:ZAD-Man|talk]]) 09:27, 2 July 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Thanks... == |
||
| − | |||
| − | I think I've gathered enough 'thanks' thanks to you to start my own 'thanks' shop... [[User:SAMWAF|SAMWAF]] ([[User talk:SAMWAF|talk]]) 08:57, 3 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | : Hehehe, well you're doing some great work so thank you again :D --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 09:05, 3 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :: I just changed a lot of infoboxes. Can you make sure that everything is tagged correctly? I'm not as familiar with the tags that this wiki is using. One thing that I may suggest is that the Category:Surgebinders and Category:Surgebinding be merged into one tag; I don't see the value in having two different tags, and currently, some characters are categorized one tag while others are under the other. [[User:SAMWAF|SAMWAF]] ([[User talk:SAMWAF|talk]]) 13:00, 4 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::: Hey there, thanks for doing that, I looked over them and didn't see any problems. The Surgebinding cat isn't supposed to have any characters in it, that's what the Surgebinders cat is for, so I'll check that out. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 13:02, 4 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::: Found and fixed problem with tag. [[User:SAMWAF|SAMWAF]] ([[User talk:SAMWAF|talk]]) 17:27, 4 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Is it possible to merge cells on a table? == |
||
| − | |||
| − | Fairly self explanatory... I've got a table of "Who was where doing what" going in the Assassination of Gavilar page, and I'm trying to work out how to merge some of the repeat cells. [[User:TheYoungBard/Assassination_of_Gavilar|Here's]] the link, for reference. |
||
| − | :yeah you should be able to do that, I'll take a look --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 03:06, 14 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == Editing and adding refrences == |
||
| − | |||
| − | How do you add a number reference source for a page currently I can only use existing ones. Also How do I identify the current ones? |
||
| − | :hey there what are you trying to reference? You can cite a chapter with {{t|book ref|b|n}} where the b is one of [[template: b|these acronyms]] and n is the chapter number or the word prologue or epilogue. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:35, 28 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | Thanks it was the book reflbln I didn't know how to make those. Just one question how do I reference the prologue? |
||
| − | |||
| − | : of Words of Radiance? {{T|book ref|sa2|prologue}} --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:28, 29 November 2015 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | On the chapter summary pages, should I redo the internal links in each chapter, or is one link for each person/thing/whatever for the whole page sufficient/desired? [[User:Hadhad|Hadhad]] ([[User talk:Hadhad|talk]]) |
||
| − | |||
| − | : You don't need to redo every character's every link. There's no firm policy really XD Thank you so much for writing the summaries :D --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 14:01, 13 February 2016 (MST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :: You're welcome. I found this wiki some time ago, and I thought it was such a great resource. I was surprised to see that there was so much to do, honestly, but I guess that comes from following such a prolific author. ([[User:Hadhad|Hadhad]] ([[User talk:Hadhad|talk]]) 15:31, 13 February 2016 (MST)) |
||
| − | |||
| − | == You deleted an imPortant research picture == |
||
| − | |||
| − | A picture posing a profound question of how allomantic lines from steel and iron work which is really hindering getting an answer on it. |
||
Revisión actual del 11:55 21 ago 2019
To contact me please come by the chatroom, and @mention me in one of the channels. Thanks
Why did you revert my edit?
I'm confused about why you reverted my most recent edit on Ars Arcanum. If italicizing book titles in headers is the convention, that's fine, but why de-italicize Elantris in the body? Disorientedperson (talk) 09:18, 2 June 2017 (MST)
- Oh, sorry I didn't see the Elantris link when I clicked the 'revert' button, that's a fine change and feel free to make it again. Sorry for the confusion. --Joe ST (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2017 (MST)
Cosmere Easter Eggs
I was curious what the policy is for pointing out cosmere connections/easter eggs. One of my additions to the article for Tetradel was recently reverted, and I'm wondering if the change itself was unwelcome, or if I'd simply put it in the wrong place. Any clarity you can offer would be helpful. Thank you! Purp (talk) 07:24, 18 July 2017 (MST)
- Hey there Purp. Your edits are certainly not unwelcome! In that case though, you added pure speculation and didn't link to any sort of significant discussion or agreement of the ideas, so me and Windrunner (one of the other staff) decided to remove it. Thank you again for all your other edits --Joe ST (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2017 (MST)
- I see. Since the lines in the two books describing the men were virtually identical, I thought that was sufficient to post the possible connection. If all connections/easter eggs require some sort of confirmation outside of the text itself, I will adjust any future contributions accordingly. Thank you for the quick response. Purp (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2017 (MST)
- Thanks for understanding. It's a good idea, but the wiki isn't really meant for every single speculation, especially since so much of speculation is in the eye of the speculator. We'd much rather keep it as things that are definitely in the books or from the words of Brandon or his team. I say you should share and discuss your theory somewhere else and then maybe someone will ask Brandon about it! --Joe ST (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2017 (MST)
Oathbringer Summaries Template
Why did you revert my edits to Template:Oathbringer Summaries? My goal was to add more chapter titles and make the chapter titles in Part 1 easier to read. --LevenThumps (talk) 11:47, 19 November 2017 (MST)
- Hey there, sorry for that, I did it because it made it harder to read on some screen resolutions. once the template is finished we will probably fix it so it looks ok wherever it's read. I'm sorry I undid some of the non line-break things too, feel free to re-add them if you want Joe ST (talk) 12:33, 19 November 2017 (MST)
Can’t create pages
I saw that Cite:Arcanum-1415 doesn’t exist and wanted to make it so that references are better-looking, but I don’t have permission to create pages. How can I gain permission to make pages? DemonDays64 (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)