Diferencia entre revisiones de «Usuario discusión:Fbstj»
Ir a la navegación
Ir a la búsqueda
(I'm fine with this change :) Sometimes my grammar is poor.) |
m (Reverted edits by Fbstj (talk) to last revision by DemonDays64) Etiqueta: Reversión |
||
| (No se muestran 79 ediciones intermedias de 26 usuarios) | |||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| + | To contact me please come by the [https://discord.gg/KEv3fhN chatroom], and @mention me in one of the channels. Thanks |
||
| − | == Azir == |
||
| + | == Why did you revert my edit? == |
||
| − | I was wondering what your reason was for reverting the changes I made to the Azir page? [[User:Arook|Arook]] ([[User talk:Arook|talk]]) 09:13, 31 May 2015 (MDT) |
||
| + | I'm confused about why you reverted my most recent edit on [[Ars Arcanum]]. If italicizing book titles in headers is the convention, that's fine, but why de-italicize ''[[Elantris]]'' in the body? [[User:Disorientedperson|Disorientedperson]] ([[User talk:Disorientedperson|talk]]) 09:18, 2 June 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | : Hey there Arook. I reverted your changes because you removed some info from the page, and while you removed redundancy we encourage you to not remove any facts if possible. Thanks for your contributions and I encourage you to continue to edit things :D --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 09:58, 31 May 2015 (MDT) |
||
| + | : Oh, sorry I didn't see the Elantris link when I clicked the 'revert' button, that's a fine change and feel free to make it again. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 14:57, 2 June 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | == Adoline == |
||
| + | == Cosmere Easter Eggs == |
||
| − | Pretty sure Adoline is just one aspect. She has OCD, others have different issues. Hence my singularization. Ja? [[User:Gargoyle]] ([[User talk:Gargoyle|talk]]) |
||
| + | I was curious what the policy is for pointing out cosmere connections/easter eggs. One of my additions to the article for Tetradel was recently reverted, and I'm wondering if the change itself was unwelcome, or if I'd simply put it in the wrong place. Any clarity you can offer would be helpful. Thank you! [[User:Purp|Purp]] ([[User talk:Purp|talk]]) 07:24, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | :It's singular they, we're never given a gender for them. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:12, 16 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| − | ::Would it be acceptable to replace "they" with "Adoline"? As is, it sounds really odd. --[[User:Gargoyle]] ([[User talk:Gargoyle|talk]]) |
||
| + | : Hey there Purp. Your edits are certainly not unwelcome! In that case though, you added pure speculation and didn't link to any sort of significant discussion or agreement of the ideas, so me and Windrunner (one of the other staff) decided to remove it. Thank you again for all your other edits --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 07:31, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | == Category Splinter == |
||
| + | :: I see. Since the lines in the two books describing the men were virtually identical, I thought that was sufficient to post the possible connection. If all connections/easter eggs require some sort of confirmation outside of the text itself, I will adjust any future contributions accordingly. Thank you for the quick response. [[User:Purp|Purp]] ([[User talk:Purp|talk]]) 07:50, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | Ok, so where is it if one already exists? |
||
| + | : Thanks for understanding. It's a good idea, but the wiki isn't really meant for every single speculation, especially since so much of speculation is in the eye of the speculator. We'd much rather keep it as things that are definitely in the books or from the words of Brandon or his team. I say you should share and discuss your theory somewhere else and then maybe someone will ask Brandon about it! --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 08:03, 18 July 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | :[[:category: splinters]] --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 23:25, 17 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
| + | == Oathbringer Summaries Template == |
||
| − | ::It would have made more sense to delete that one becuase the only page pointing to it is this one [[User:Arook|Arook]] ([[User talk:Arook|talk]]) 23:47, 17 June 2015 (MDT) Arook |
||
| − | : |
+ | Why did you revert my edits to [[Template:Oathbringer Summaries]]? My goal was to add more chapter titles and make the chapter titles in Part 1 easier to read. --[[User:LevenThumps|LevenThumps]] ([[User talk:LevenThumps|talk]]) 11:47, 19 November 2017 (MST) |
| + | : Hey there, sorry for that, I did it because it made it ''harder'' to read on some screen resolutions. once the template is finished we will probably fix it so it looks ok wherever it's read. I'm sorry I undid some of the non line-break things too, feel free to re-add them if you want [[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 12:33, 19 November 2017 (MST) |
||
| − | == Regarding Places Category == |
||
| + | == Can’t create pages == |
||
| − | Hello. |
||
| + | I saw that [[Cite:Arcanum-1415]] doesn’t exist and wanted to make it so that references are better-looking, but I don’t have permission to create pages. How can I gain permission to make pages? [[User:DemonDays64|DemonDays64]] ([[User talk:DemonDays64|talk]]) 19:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
| − | I realized soon after I made the change on the Alendel page that it hadn't worked out as I'd hoped, but I'm not exactly sure why. The Category:Places Category was removed by Chaos, to be replaced with Category:Locations, and I was trying to get rid of a redlink category. However, when I swapped around the word 'Place' with 'Location', it didn't work. Is there any way you would suggest that we can get rid of the redlink category? |
||
| − | |||
| − | : Hey, it's great to see you editing. That's because you didn't change a category (<nowiki>[[Category: places]]</nowiki>) you changed the template ({{t|place}}), which automatically adds [[:Category: Locations]]. What you were seeing when you saw it was still in [[:Category: PLaces]] was a cached version of the page --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:15, 18 June 2015 (MDT) |
||
Revisión actual del 11:55 21 ago 2019
To contact me please come by the chatroom, and @mention me in one of the channels. Thanks
Why did you revert my edit?
I'm confused about why you reverted my most recent edit on Ars Arcanum. If italicizing book titles in headers is the convention, that's fine, but why de-italicize Elantris in the body? Disorientedperson (talk) 09:18, 2 June 2017 (MST)
- Oh, sorry I didn't see the Elantris link when I clicked the 'revert' button, that's a fine change and feel free to make it again. Sorry for the confusion. --Joe ST (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2017 (MST)
Cosmere Easter Eggs
I was curious what the policy is for pointing out cosmere connections/easter eggs. One of my additions to the article for Tetradel was recently reverted, and I'm wondering if the change itself was unwelcome, or if I'd simply put it in the wrong place. Any clarity you can offer would be helpful. Thank you! Purp (talk) 07:24, 18 July 2017 (MST)
- Hey there Purp. Your edits are certainly not unwelcome! In that case though, you added pure speculation and didn't link to any sort of significant discussion or agreement of the ideas, so me and Windrunner (one of the other staff) decided to remove it. Thank you again for all your other edits --Joe ST (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2017 (MST)
- I see. Since the lines in the two books describing the men were virtually identical, I thought that was sufficient to post the possible connection. If all connections/easter eggs require some sort of confirmation outside of the text itself, I will adjust any future contributions accordingly. Thank you for the quick response. Purp (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2017 (MST)
- Thanks for understanding. It's a good idea, but the wiki isn't really meant for every single speculation, especially since so much of speculation is in the eye of the speculator. We'd much rather keep it as things that are definitely in the books or from the words of Brandon or his team. I say you should share and discuss your theory somewhere else and then maybe someone will ask Brandon about it! --Joe ST (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2017 (MST)
Oathbringer Summaries Template
Why did you revert my edits to Template:Oathbringer Summaries? My goal was to add more chapter titles and make the chapter titles in Part 1 easier to read. --LevenThumps (talk) 11:47, 19 November 2017 (MST)
- Hey there, sorry for that, I did it because it made it harder to read on some screen resolutions. once the template is finished we will probably fix it so it looks ok wherever it's read. I'm sorry I undid some of the non line-break things too, feel free to re-add them if you want Joe ST (talk) 12:33, 19 November 2017 (MST)
Can’t create pages
I saw that Cite:Arcanum-1415 doesn’t exist and wanted to make it so that references are better-looking, but I don’t have permission to create pages. How can I gain permission to make pages? DemonDays64 (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)