Diferencia entre revisiones de «Leyes de la magia de Sanderson»

Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
sin resumen de edición
m (Correct link to disambig)
 
(No se muestran 2 ediciones intermedias de 2 usuarios)
 
== [[bws: sandersons-first-law|Sanderson's First Law]] ==
 
: '''An author's ability to solve conflict with magic is DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL to how well the reader understands said magic.'''
 
If characters (especially viewpoint characters) solve a problem by use of magic, the reader should be made to understand how that magic works. Otherwise, the magic can constitute a ''deus ex machina''.
 
 
== [[bws: sandersons-second-law|Sanderson's Second Law]] ==
 
: '''Limitations > Power'''
 
The limitations of a magic system are more interesting than its capabilities. What the magic ''can't'' do is more interesting than what it ''can''.
=== Limitations ===
 
=== Weaknesses and costs ===
Weaknesses and costs alike make a magic system more interesting. Weaknesses are generally harder to keep sensible and the kryptonite example has become a staple of easy storytelling. Brandon encourages writers to make up more interesting weaknesses than "Lose powers if x". Costs on the other hand are a great way of limiting a character and the use of the magic. In [[the Wheel of Time]] series the cost is that the users of the magic will slowly go insane. Although the metals in [[Allomancy|Mistborn]] and the stormlightStormlight in [[The Stormlight Archive]] may sound like costs, they are actually limitations. Metals and Stormlight aren’t crucial to the characters or the plot outside of magic, and thus only limit the abilities of the user.
 
== [[bws: sandersons-third-law-of-magic|Sanderson's Third Law]] ==
 
: '''Expand on what you have already, before you add something new.'''
 
"A brilliant magic system for a book is less often one with a thousand different powers and abilities -- and is more often a magic system with relatively few powers that the author has considered in depth."
'''Err on the side of AWESOME.'''
 
Brandon has, in his online lectures, described his ultimate rule as that of making magic "awesome" (in the colloquial sense), and further implied that said "awesomeness" takes precedence over exact obedience to the other three laws.{{wob ref|6227}} This rule is primarily to be understood in the sense of beginning with an interesting (i.e. "awesome") idea, and building the magic system or fantastical technology upon said idea from there, rather than to simply disregarding the previously mentioned laws - rather, those laws should bend to the "awesomeness" of the idea, and not take priority over it, thus keeping the idea behind the magic system "awesome".{{wob ref|7077}}
 
(ThisThe refersnaming of this law is a reference to Isaac Asimov's Zeroth Law of his Three Laws of Robotics.)
 
== Notes ==
Shards, Editors, Keepers, Synod
18 238

ediciones

Menú de navegación