Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Aon»
Ir a la navegación
Ir a la búsqueda
m |
|||
| Línea 5: | Línea 5: | ||
:: What do you mean about the "science of Aons"? I move that we delete this list. There's not really a huge amount of usefulness in putting the Aons in order of appearance, in my opinion. A comprehensive alphabetical list is better overall. However, there might be something useful in an Aon article, discussing the symbols themselves and their origin, rather than listing them, so I don't think we should do away with this article completely, simply rework it into a more useful form. --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 13:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
:: What do you mean about the "science of Aons"? I move that we delete this list. There's not really a huge amount of usefulness in putting the Aons in order of appearance, in my opinion. A comprehensive alphabetical list is better overall. However, there might be something useful in an Aon article, discussing the symbols themselves and their origin, rather than listing them, so I don't think we should do away with this article completely, simply rework it into a more useful form. --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 13:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | : I didn't really mean science, more what you said; history, general stuff, etc.. not really describing it well but heh --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 14:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revisión del 14:31 2 may 2013
Merge with list?
Is there a reason why this page and the List of Aons page are separate? It seems to me they should be combined.--WeiryWriter (talk) 23:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think this page is supposed to talk about the science of Aon's where as the list discusses particulars. It might be better if they get merged though. Any opinions? --Joe ST (talk) 11:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- What do you mean about the "science of Aons"? I move that we delete this list. There's not really a huge amount of usefulness in putting the Aons in order of appearance, in my opinion. A comprehensive alphabetical list is better overall. However, there might be something useful in an Aon article, discussing the symbols themselves and their origin, rather than listing them, so I don't think we should do away with this article completely, simply rework it into a more useful form. --Windrunner (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)