Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Odium»

Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
m (Remove current discussion tag)
 
I agree with this. I don't think Ruin was short sighted as he carefully orchestrated events in his favor for thousands of years. The whole section reads like an opinion piece without any sources from Sanderson. I think it should be rewritten. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.154.7|172.68.154.7]] 12:51, 11 December 2017 (MST)
 
I might offer some alternative speculation (having read through book 3) that Odium is the Shard of spiritual-division, where Honor is the Shard of spiritual-binding. He would therefore be attuned to the competing appetites and passions within sentient life, as well as to hatred, manipulation, deception, judgment, atonement, and grief. I consider him a change-oriented Shard. In my opinion, this would give him great knowledge of the future, rivalled by Endowment and Cultivation, but with a blind spot for the possibility of souls to choose not to change or be divided, even when everything pressures them to do so--such as Jasnah's choice of mercy and Dalinar's choice of pain.
[[User:Ebenezer|Ebenezer]] ([[User talk:Ebenezer|talk]]) 13:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 
== The Thrill ==