Diferencia entre revisiones de «Coppermind discusión:Editor's Corner»

De La Coppermind
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
Línea 9: Línea 9:
   
 
:: Yeah it made more sense for the previous way of thinking about article statuses, so I will make it better now. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:36, 19 April 2015 (MDT)
 
:: Yeah it made more sense for the previous way of thinking about article statuses, so I will make it better now. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:36, 19 April 2015 (MDT)
  +
  +
== Category: Places no longer exists. It should be removed. ==
  +
  +
Fairly self explanatory. I will put up the same argument on the Coppermind section of 17th Shard, but there is no point having a link to a category that doesn't exist.

Revisión del 06:30 18 jun 2015

Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading.

Stub to Complete Ratio is 1.164. That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion.

I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. -- boosiv

Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT)
Yeah it made more sense for the previous way of thinking about article statuses, so I will make it better now. --Joe ST (talk) 11:36, 19 April 2015 (MDT)

Category: Places no longer exists. It should be removed.

Fairly self explanatory. I will put up the same argument on the Coppermind section of 17th Shard, but there is no point having a link to a category that doesn't exist.