Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Ba-Ado-Mishram»
Ir a la navegación
Ir a la búsqueda
m |
|||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| − | I've been thinking we should add a speculation section for this page. Ba-Ado-Mishram is the most mysterious of the Unmade, apart from Dai-Gonarthis and maybe Chemoarish. |
+ | I've been thinking we should add a speculation section for this page. Ba-Ado-Mishram is the most mysterious of the Unmade, apart from Dai-Gonarthis and maybe Chemoarish. --Niser |
| + | |||
| − | --Niser |
||
| + | :Speculation should be used very sparingly on the Coppermind. Articles are not a place for whatever speculation an individual wishes; that is what forums are for. We are working to cull a lot of unwarranted speculation on the wiki that can still exist. See [[Coppermind:Speculation]], though we are harsher on speculation now than in the past. I am skeptical a speculation section would be in line with our guidelines. This article is very complete for the mentions of her. So I do not think speculation should be included almost all the time. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
Revisión del 21:24 3 dic 2020
I've been thinking we should add a speculation section for this page. Ba-Ado-Mishram is the most mysterious of the Unmade, apart from Dai-Gonarthis and maybe Chemoarish. --Niser
- Speculation should be used very sparingly on the Coppermind. Articles are not a place for whatever speculation an individual wishes; that is what forums are for. We are working to cull a lot of unwarranted speculation on the wiki that can still exist. See Coppermind:Speculation, though we are harsher on speculation now than in the past. I am skeptical a speculation section would be in line with our guidelines. This article is very complete for the mentions of her. So I do not think speculation should be included almost all the time. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)