Revisión del 07:16 9 mar 2015 (ver código) TSMagus (discusión \| contribs.) ← Edición anterior		Revisión del 19:12 6 jul 2015 (ver código) TSMagus (discusión \| contribs.) (→‎Speculation) Edición siguiente →
== Speculation == {{theory}} Many believe the author of the first of these letters is [[Hoid]]. An excellent argument in favor of this point has been posted [[17s-topic:76\|on the forums]]. Sanderson confirmed that we "may have read that Hoid has specific beef with Rayse," and given that the Letter is the only writing that mentions anyone specifically having a grudge against Rayse, this can be seen as an acknowledgement that Hoid wrote the First Letter{{17s ref\|post\|50695\|text=Hoid has a specific beef against Rayse.\|date=2013-03-15}}. The Second Letter, from the epigraphs of Words of Radiance, indicates that the original writer had taken on a name describing one of his "presumed virtues". This could be inferred to mean his "wit", which would serve to re-enforce the theory that Wit (known to be Hoid) was the author of the original Letter{{epigraph ref\|wor\|60}}. Sanderson also made no correction when asked about "Hoid's letter," in a Q&A session{{qa ref\|1067\|2\|Is the "old reptile" a dragon?\|date=2013-09-24}}. ~~Many believe the author of the first of these letters is [[Hoid]]. An excellent argument in favor of this point has been posted [[17s-topic:76\|on the forums]].~~ [[The Recipient]]'s identity is less clear, but their non-intervention policy and some other details may suggest that it is [[Frost]], from [[Dragonsteel Prime\|Dragonsteel]].{{tweet ref\|22409474870349824\|Frost's appearance in other books\|date=2011-01-04}} It is confirmed that we "may have read that Hoid has specific beef with Rayse." Given that the Letter is the only writing that mentions anyone specifically having a grudge against Rayse, this can be seen as an acknowledgement that Hoid wrote the Letter.{{17s ref\|post\|50695\|text=Hoid has a specific beef against Rayse.\|date=2013-03-15}} In Words of Radiance, a group of epigraphs seem to reply to this letter, indicating that the original writer had taken on a name that describes one of his "presumed virtues". This could be inferred to mean his "wit", which would serve to re-enforce the theory that Wit (known to be Hoid) was the author of the original Letter. {{epigraph ref\|wor\|60}} Another strong implication is given in an interview question about the "old reptile" when the mentioning of Hoid as author of the First Letter is refused.{{qa ref\|1067\|2\|Is the "old reptile" a dragon?\|date=2013-09-24}} The recipient's non-intervention policy may indicate that he is [[Frost]].{{tweet ref\|22409474870349824\|Frost's appearance in other books\|date=2011-01-04}} == Notes ==

Diferencia entre revisiones de «Cartas»

Cartas (ver código)

Revisión del 19:12 6 jul 2015