Diferencia entre revisiones de «Usuario discusión:Kit»

De La Coppermind
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
m (→‎Reverts: +reply)
Línea 15: Línea 15:
   
 
Thanks again for your help --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (MDT)
 
Thanks again for your help --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (MDT)
  +
  +
Fair point, I use the wiki for cosmere, but you're right.

Revisión del 17:57 27 oct 2015

Reverts

Hey Kit. It's great to see you editing! Thank you so much for your time.

You may have noticed that I keep reverting your changes. Particularly the Threnody#Astronomy and Metallic Arts#Titles of Metalborn sections. I reverted the Threnody stuff because you were removing info from a page (I saw you'd imported it into another page but we're still discussing what we think about that, it may be that we want that merging into the Cosmere page) and the twinborn table I reverted because we only have 1 name right now. I'm sure we'll get more eventually but for now your table made the whole page look weird (with it sideways scrolling) and the table itself wasn't that great. User: WeiryWriter has actually started on a 'better' looking table here and we may merge that into the Twinborn page at some point.

Thank's so much again for your editing, we all hope to see what you come up with in the future! --Joe ST (talk) 04:48, 27 October 2015 (MDT)

Hey man, I'm greatful for the help in making sure I don't mess things up too much. I can see why the Metallic Arts got changed back, though I would like the various things to be somewhere on the page, but not Threnody because that information is on the Astronomy page and not as relevant to Threnody as a whole. (talk)
Hey Kit.

I'd say we all agree with having the information easy to find and shown in an easy to read way. I'll prod Weiry into seeing if he'll help you get his page into the articles in some fashion.

The Threnody info was actually relevant to that page, as it would be relevant to all the shardworld pages and the cosmere article itself, and eventually someone will go to each of the pages and add the relevant info. I agree that there should be a central, detailed and in-depth description, and that may live on the Astronomy page, rather than integrated into the cosmere article, but it definitely belongs on the planet pages as well (or else where would you suggest we put celestial info on non-cosmere books?) if less detailed?

Thanks again for your help --Joe ST (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (MDT)

Fair point, I use the wiki for cosmere, but you're right.