577
ediciones
Diferencia entre revisiones de «Usuario discusión:Fbstj»
→Stub template: new section
(→Stub template: new section) |
|||
|
Do we want to use the switches instead of the subtemplates? It would seem easier to implement if it isn't server intensive or something like that. Your thoughts?--[[User:Beligaronia|Beligaronia]] ([[User talk:Beligaronia|talk]]) 23:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
:I guess a #switch: for the world though the race|homeland|etc → world translation could be its own template, much like the homeland|race → race one ({{[[Template:Race|Race]]}}) might be better. I was actually gonna wait until more consensus/organization happens before doing much more on those, hehehe. I hear ParserFunctions is probably more server intensive than multiple-deep transclude, though I dont know for sure. [[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] 00:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
== Stub template ==
What do you think about the stub template going at the bottom of an article, rather than in the middle. Wikipedia puts it at the bottom and it would cause less disruption to what little information these pages have. Another option would be to put it at the very top, above the text if you're worried it will go unnoticed.--[[User:Beligaronia|Beligaronia]] ([[User talk:Beligaronia|talk]]) 22:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||