Diferencia entre revisiones de «Plantilla discusión:Complete»
Ir a la navegación
Ir a la búsqueda
(suggestion) |
m (→Reviewed: +reply) |
||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| − | ==Reviewed== |
+ | == Reviewed == |
If an article has been reviewed, attaining complete '''and''' reviewed status ([[Koolf]] is an example), the little message saying "It has yet to be reviewed." should not be displayed, I should think. But I don't know how to fix this. [[User:Hadhad|Hadhad]] ([[User talk:Hadhad|talk]]) 08:21, 16 May 2016 (MDT) |
If an article has been reviewed, attaining complete '''and''' reviewed status ([[Koolf]] is an example), the little message saying "It has yet to be reviewed." should not be displayed, I should think. But I don't know how to fix this. [[User:Hadhad|Hadhad]] ([[User talk:Hadhad|talk]]) 08:21, 16 May 2016 (MDT) |
||
| + | : this is because we've changed how we mark articles as reviewed; the reviewed=yes method is now depreciated in favour of the reviewer adding a signature which helps show how long ago the article was reviewed. They're still 'reviewed' but they require a re-review to verify that they're still complete. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:49, 17 May 2016 (MDT) |
||
Revisión actual del 07:49 17 may 2016
Reviewed
If an article has been reviewed, attaining complete and reviewed status (Koolf is an example), the little message saying "It has yet to be reviewed." should not be displayed, I should think. But I don't know how to fix this. Hadhad (talk) 08:21, 16 May 2016 (MDT)
- this is because we've changed how we mark articles as reviewed; the reviewed=yes method is now depreciated in favour of the reviewer adding a signature which helps show how long ago the article was reviewed. They're still 'reviewed' but they require a re-review to verify that they're still complete. --Joe ST (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2016 (MDT)