La Coppermind

Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Vínculo Nahel»

Discusión:Vínculo Nahel (ver código)

Revisión del 16:33 9 feb 2022

704 bytes eliminados ,  hace 2 años
m
Ayanyx trasladó la página Discusión:Nahel bond a Discusión:Vínculo Nahel: Traducción al español
m (Ayanyx trasladó la página Discusión:Nahel bond a Discusión:Vínculo Nahel: Traducción al español)
 
(No se muestran 6 ediciones intermedias de 6 usuarios)
==Spren of Bondsmiths==
=={{t|attention}}==
MightPlease beleave me,the but"spren istype" for and Bondsmiths as "unique" at this reallytime. aThe pagetype needingisn't urgent"unknown"--we attention,likely whenknow everythingas thatmuch isas knownwe ever will about thewhat Nahel"type" bondof spren Stormfather is. onAnd it?"Bondsmith" Thereor is"Bondsmith nothingspren" moreisn't thanquite theright twoeither, citationsand indoesn't tell anything besides the bookobvious. Everything"Unique" expresses the fact that wouldthere beare addedno isother spren of it's speculationtype. --[[User:TelcontarJofwu|TelcontarJofwu]] ([[User talk:TelcontarJofwu|talk]]) 19:3148, 712 NovemberDecember 20122017 (UTCMST)
: Removed --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 06:43, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 
That's fine I disagree that is all we will ever know but unqiue works but Nale should still be on that list and the Renarin's Spren is corrupted. -- Arook
==Delete?==
Cem, would you please explain your reasoning as to why you added a delete tag to this page? While I could see it being merged, but I think this needs to be discussed first, before the delete tag should have been added?--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 18:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
:My reasoning is Nahel bond is an intrinsic part of Surgebinding and should definitely be discussed on that page. Also as far as I'm aware of, only the bond between spren and the Surgebinder is called the Nahel bond, so its existence is entirely dependent on Surgebinding, if that makes sense. I doubt if I managed to put everything we know on the Surgebinding article, but I think I at least covered a significant amount of it. If there's missing stuff, it can and should be added to Surgebinding, because it directly involves Surgebinding itself. So I don't think there's any point to having the same content in two different places.--[[User:Cem|Cem]] ([[User talk:Cem|talk]]) 00:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
:: It depends on how big the section ends up being imo. I see your point cem but I would hold that it would be better as it's own page --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 08:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 
==Abilities granted by Stormlight==
== Nightblood a spren? ==
There's a strange line that's been there for a while saying that stormlight doesn't give people skill with a sword. It just seems wholly unnecessary. I mean we could list literally millions of things that stormlight *doesn't* do. Why even have that specific line?
 
==Definition of Nahel Bond==
Someone has listed Nightblood as a spren for Szeth with no citation. Seems like speculation, and though an interesting one, it seems misleading if there isn't source confirmation.
It turns out Mr. Sanderson uses the term Nahel bond for Ryshadium and greatshells as well,{{wob ref|14509}} which makes me wonder if we aren't using it too narrowly. I feel that we should change the name of this page to Radiant bond. --Niser, using a different computer
 
:The plan is to expand this page to fully cover the meaning of "Nahel bond." --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 16:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Here's an interesting thread on the topic of Nightblood, saying it's a splinter, a "robot spren", and a shardblade. http://www.17thshard.com/forum/topic/56565-nightblood-a-splinter/ Not sure if this is canon.
Ayanyx
Shards, Editors, Keepers, Synod
18 407

ediciones

Obtenido de «https://es.coppermind.net/wiki/Especial:MobileDiff/66170...161382»