Diferencia entre revisiones de «Discusión:Aon»

:::Wow, Chaos... That's quite a block of text. Reading it though, I can't say I find anything there I disagree with. I am vehemently opposed to making a spren index though. I like the little articles, and we're only going to get more details as the series goes on, such as what fabrials they're used in, properties of the spren, what form they bond with Parshendi to make, etc. In reality, the only three Aons worthy of their own page are the ones Brandon expanded on for the Badali jewelry page. I could see making a separate article for them, but they still need a place on the main index, with one of those little italicized, "main article" links, in my opinion. --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 06:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

:Hopefully you don't mind me intruding on this discussion. I personally do not think we should split the Aons into their own articles. I wrote this article, and the Rithmatics one, the way I did for ease of use. If someone comes to the wiki wanting to learn everything we know about the different Aons I don't think they should have to click through however many pages, the information should be on one. Likewise I don't think most spren should have their own articles (I was planning on doing a mock-up of a index page for spren like I did with the Aons when I got around to re-reading WoK which will be sooner than later at this point). There is probably more I could say about the subject but I don't want to get too persnickety so I'll leave it at that.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 15:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)